When higher level structures are recognized as certain (illusory) objects, they follow their own laws, e.g. chemical laws, biological laws, economical laws, etc. While these laws don’t violate physics laws, they are not physics laws, and mostly cannot be derived from physics laws. Why?
One critical reason (a personal opinion) may be drop-offs. Normally an interaction should follow the chemical law. But it could happen that, due to local physics conditions, a particular molecule may not be able to follow the chemical law temporarily. In such circumstances, certain atom/electron (the real concrete-objects, hardware) of the molecule could be dragged out (dropped-off) from the molecule temporarily by the physics force and is later replaced by a nearby like atom/electron, thus preventing the physics law from being violated, while at the same time the chemical law (between the molecular structures, the software) is also observed. Thus, we see drop-off keeps higher level chemical law and lower level physics law both being observed, yet the chemical law cannot be derived from the physics law. That is why free higher level laws can be implemented independently of lower level laws. Higher level laws are between the conceptual software, while lower level laws are between real concrete-objects (hardware). From physics point of view, chemical laws are not between real objects but between illusions (molecules) and hence would not conflict physics laws. This is believed to be how supply and demand law, biological laws, chemical laws and physics laws are all implemented simultaneously without conflicting each other and how mind got room to manipulate those (illusory) objects.
Pg 30 If reading more helps to understand better, you may visit my fast pace blog at: http://FromPhysicsToMetaphysicsFastPace.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment